

Acquafresca Going Back to Inter?-This is what is wrong with Soccer.
By: Jeremy | April 16th, 2008One of the worst things about being a fan of a small team is that you cant keep your players for very long unless no one else wants them. If the player is good, he eventually signs for a bigger club with the small team getting either cash to help stay in business or some young players. For the big clubs, its all about now. For the small clubs its all about financial survival with as long a run in Serie A as possible.
Part of what should make you a fan of a team is that you get to see players who become favorites for whatever reason. The longer they are on your team the better. That is one reason I am huge fan of David Suazo. I wish he would never have left. However, when that happens, and it works out with a young player like Acquafresca coming back in return, you dont want to have to turn around and give the young player back because he develops sooner then expected.
As much as I hate the big teams in baseball like the Red Sox or Yankees, when they come trying to steal one of my teams stud players because we cant afford him, they typically give us prospects who we at least control for a few years before they can become free agents and are paid fairly cheaply while we have them. Soccer needs to implement this kind of plan as these players cash in way too soon preventing the league from being as competitive as it could.
To me one thing that keeps soccer from having much credibility in the USA is that the players are bought and sold with the 10 biggest clubs in Europe dividing up who they want and paying whatever amount necessary. The lower level teams, even in the same league, are just farm teams for the big clubs and if they find a young player, they are soon sold to the big club.
This seems to be the latest problem for Cagliari and I wonder how much say they have in the matter so maybe someone smarter then me can enlighten us. Inter traded half interest in Acquafresca as part of the deal to bring Suazo to Inter. Suazo does not fit at Inter and they only signed him in case someone got hurt or to keep another team from getting him. Oh to have that luxury in Sardinia. The bottom line is the deal was made and we now have half ownership in a great young player. Why cant he stay in Sardinia for awhile? It seems like we are being forced to give him up to a team that now has no more rights to him then we do.
Part of me always thought Suazo would return to Cagliari and that seems to be the latest discussion. Inter realizes Suazo isnt needed, wants to return him to us, and have us give back our half interest in Acquafresca. What a bunch of bs. Its like the Yankees doing a midseason deal for a stud off a bad team, giving up promising young players in the deal, and then wanting to undo it after they lose in the playoffs because the young players suddenly have promise.
If a deal is made to return Bobby back to Inter, fine. I may not agree with it, but deals get done all the time. However, now that Bobby is clearly a better player then he was last year, it should take more then just simply sending us Suazo back. Id love for Suazo to come back, dont get me wrong, but it shouldnt be under Inters terms.
I assume it is the best deal we can get because either Acquafrescas contract expires soon ie after next year, he wouldnt return to Cagliari even if we can afford him, so we better get something back. Even if that is the case, my vote would be to sell him for max money, get our half from the deal, keep Inter from getting him and then using the money to buy other players.
I am sure I am missing something, but as long as this type of stuff happens so easily, the small clubs will never have much of a fan base outside of the town they are in and certainly cant win anything. I know this will be the first loss and Storari and Foggia are next, but if we could keep these guys, survive this year, and add a couple more players next year, we could challenge for Europe in my opinion. At the very least we wouldnt be relegation fodder.
I really wish someone would explain Cagliaris or any other small clubs option in these kind of cases. I hate becoming a fan of a player to see him leave
so quickly.
Inter needs to shove it up their Champions League failing A$$.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Wouldn’t Acquafresca’s immediate future depend largely on the original terms of the co-ownership agreement? Like when did they schedule the blind auction for? Inter like to settle these things before it gets that far, but I’d have assumed Cagliari would have negotiated for at least two years with the player, especially since Acquafresca was not seriously in Inter’s plans last summer.
And I understand your complaints about big teams, but honestly I’m far from convinced that American style parity is desirable, as I feel it actually makes the NBA and NFL somewhat dull. That and I think baseball style trades would require players to sacrifice much of their contractual rights (see: MLS), and I doubt they or UEFA/FIFA would be willing to allow that. But I’d still love to see Serie A improve its infrastructure in different way, maybe getting rid of these co-ownerships and limiting loans (so Juve don’t own half the players in the league), and then helping smaller clubs modernize their stadia.
Posted from
United States

-



Of course you are right that the terms of the deal between Inter and Cagliari over the player are important. I dont know what they are, but maybe its just the mentality of the big club. They want him back so they will take him. Why cant Cagliari say no, we want to keep him? Its all about the money so Inter will get him when they want him. Even if they did agree to let him stay at Cagliari for two years, if Inter wants to bring him back early, they just pay off Cagliari.
As for parity making the NBA and NFL dull, the NFL is as popular and as exciting as ever even if I am not a big fan. The salary cap and player movement has made more teams competitive. As for the NBA, I dont know how much parity truly exists overall, but you cant tell me that the Western Conference playoffs wont be exciting with 8 teams who are basically within 3-5 games of each other. When has that ever happened? The east with one or two good teams is a joke.
I think the best way is the baseball way. The teams need to be able to control young players for longer without being forced to sell because of money. Of course this effects the players freedom of movement the first few years of their career, but for the overall competitiveness of Serie A to improve, some kind of agreement will have to take place. While I am anti labor, I think a soccers players union would be beneficial for everyone. It has made the players in other leagues rich and eliminates or prevents horrible entry level contracts.
Posted from
United States

-



He’s on a co-ownership deal, so Inter and Cagliari have the option to renew the deal for one more season, meaning he will stay at Cagliari next season. Then at the end of next season if Inter and Cagliari don’t work out a deal to buy him fully, it would go to a blind auction, and the highest bidder would get to own Acquafresca fully.
Posted from
United States

-



Look like Acquafresca is going to A.C.Milan and Cagliari
in return would keep Storari and Matri(both Milan players) plus money.It is early and Cellino might leave
at the end of the season.Posted from
United Kingdom

Comments are closed













